On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 06:10:28AM -0800, Sawyer X via RT wrote: > On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:09:12 -0800, ilmari wrote: > > Andreas Koenig <andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR@franz.ak.mind.de> writes: > > > > > What is the state of this ticket? From looking at it it looks stalled. > > > Was there any additional activity? > > > > > > Has anybody summarised? Reported to Marc? Provided a patch? Considered > > > improving? Considered reverting? > > > > I provided a patch in > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=132142#txn-1493873, but > > just realised there's a simpler way to do it, which I've attached. > > > > As mentioned in that previous message, I'm not in the mood to confront > > Marc over this, but Sawyer graciously offered to do that for me. > > > > Sawyer, do you feel like sending these two patches to Marc and suggest > > he applies one of them to keep AnyEvent working on blead? Note that > > AnyEvent's own test suite doesn't trigger the bug, but AnyEvent::HTTP > > does. > > I didn't receive an email for this correspondence so I only saw the ping from Andreas. I have just sent an email to Marc with the latest patch, asking to apply the patch and release a new version. P5P was CC'ed on the email as well. My understanding of the current state of this 5.28 blocker ticket is: 1) A bug fix to blead removed an inadvertent user-visible difference between '@b = sort @a' and '@a sort @a'; the latter is internally optimised, but such optimisations shouldn't make visible changes to sort behaviour. 2) AnyEvent relied on this now-fixed buggy behaviour; 3) A patch has been privately submitted to Marc; 4) There has not been a new release of AnyEvent yet; 5) There was a brief discussion about the desirability of an explicit in-place sort feature. I propose a) this ticket is removed from 5.28 blockers. b) is kept open in case anyone wants to propose an in-place sort syntax or mechanism. -- Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.Thread Previous | Thread Next