On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 06:46:24 -0800, khw wrote: > I looked at the man page for this module, and it doesn't give anything > past 5.22. So I don't understand how Jim can say they appear to > expect to be Unicode 10 conforming. > > What I think happened is that Unicode 10 made some change that > violated the assumptions of this module, and that we should reject > this ticket, and make sure one is opened on the module Slaven++ did open a ticket https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=122862 on Aug 21 2017 No response from the maintainer as of yet. -- Karl Williamson --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131810Thread Next