On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:19:50 -0800, demerphq wrote: > On 24 February 2018 at 16:39, Father Chrysostomos via RT > <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > > That puts a burden on perl maintainers to remember which version > > scheme to use in each case. I seem to remember it was Ricardo Signes > > that ruled that upstream-blead modules should not have underscores in > > their versions. That makes things much simpler for me, at least. > > This just came up in another context for me. Doesnt this policy just > move the burden around? Who is responsible for bumping the version > then? The first person to change the file in a given release? Yes, and we have a porting test that politely reminds the first person who changes each module. > The RM? > It still seems to me that a version bump every patch is the sanest way > to deal with this stuff while at the same time not externalizing the > costs of the version updates onto someone else... -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131046Thread Previous | Thread Next