On 02/24/2018 05:00 AM, demerphq wrote: > On 24 February 2018 at 02:34, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: >> demerphq wrote: >>> Zefram, that is an uncalled for comment and beneath you. >> It is uncalled for to say that there are a couple of problems with >> the commit? Am I misunderstanding what constitutes civility? > I was referring to "inadequacy of the code change", which I dont feel > is outright uncivil, but IMO is the type of comment that is beneath > someone of your obvious intelligence. I think a different phrasing reflecting Zefram's intent would be "I don't think this change is sufficient enough to cover the problem."Thread Previous | Thread Next