On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:48:15AM -0000, Father Chrysostomos wrote: > Avar wrote: > > > The way perlpolicy is worded now, we could introduce an "experimental" > > feature and not change its semantics for 20 years, and still call it > > "experimental". That's absurd. > > Such a situation would be absurd, but there is nothing absurd about a > policy that does not take absurd situations into account. We do not > need a policy comprehensible only to lawyers. I think it took close to 20 years for /(?{ })/ and /(?{{ }})/ to lose their experimental status. (Although they were introduced long before we codified "expirimental status"). AbigailThread Previous | Thread Next