Avar wrote: > How are we going to handle the next new feature that gets introduced in > 5.30, gets marked as experimental in 5.40, That will not happen. My understanding was that experimental status being applied retroactively was a very exceptional thing, and applied only to two features that had caused problems since the day they were included in a stable release. The whole point of establishing our current way of introducing non-trivial (and even some trivial) features was to avoid that kind of mess in the future. > and someone wants to change > in 5.48?Thread Previous | Thread Next