On 12/23/2017 06:34 PM, Zefram wrote: > Sawyer X wrote: >> If so, how would that be "significant extra compilation"? > "complication", not "compilation". Muscle memory when typing. > That clause was conditional on > the situation in which we have non-core attributes that affect body > compilation, in which case your assumption that we have a list of such > attributes would necessarily be false. We can only have a complete > list if we rule out forever allowing non-core attributes to affect > body compilation. We can document that every compilation-affecting subroutine attribute should be used before. Another way is to add a mechanism to register an attribute as "requiring compilation," allowing us to croak about them if we see them after signatures. Not an optimal solution, to say the least.Thread Previous | Thread Next