Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2017
On 12/13/2017 12:04 AM, Leon Timmermans wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com > <mailto:fawaka@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org > <mailto:zefram@fysh.org>> wrote: > > However, as far as I can see there's no need at all for the > module to > delay execution of the code it generates by putting it in an > INIT block. > If that code is instead executed immediately, by deleting the > word "INIT" > to turn it into a bare block, everything works. With that > alteration > to the module, the Module-Install distro passes its test suite. > > > Given Module::Install's rather unfortunate bundling nature, that > would require rereleasing all 119 distributions using it to be > rereleased with such a new Module::Install. > > > Well, all 119 modules using Module::Install::DSL, Module::Install in > general has quite a few more users. That is indeed a pain. What is the cost of reverting this commit instead?Thread Previous | Thread Next