On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> wrote: > >> However, as far as I can see there's no need at all for the module to >> delay execution of the code it generates by putting it in an INIT block. >> If that code is instead executed immediately, by deleting the word "INIT" >> to turn it into a bare block, everything works. With that alteration >> to the module, the Module-Install distro passes its test suite. >> > > Given Module::Install's rather unfortunate bundling nature, that would > require rereleasing all 119 distributions using it to be rereleased with > such a new Module::Install. > Well, all 119 modules using Module::Install::DSL, Module::Install in general has quite a few more users. LeonThread Previous | Thread Next