Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2017
Zefram wrote: > The change in core behaviour is intentional and should remain. As long as > DBM::Deep has its own warnif logic (which it has for a valid reason, see > comment in its source) it needs to keep the hack up to date. Fortunately, > the change required in DBM::Deep is very easy, not even requiring any Perl > version condition. It just needs to drop the checks of the bits for the > "all" category. Those checks are now not correct, but interestingly > they also don't do anything on older Perl versions. They're correct on > older Perl versions, but only relevant for non-core warning categories, > and DBM::Deep only uses this duplicated warnif on a core category. Thank you. I have write access to the DBM::Deep repository. I can change it myself (probably on the weekend).Thread Previous