On Sun, 02 Jul 2017 08:19:31 GMT, mauke- wrote: > On Sun, 02 Jul 2017 01:14:12 -0700, mauke- wrote: > > > > I'd like to be able __builtin_add_overflow, __builtin_sub_overflow, > > __builtin_mul_overflow (safe +, -, * with overflow checks) in core > > code. > > > > It would be nice if Configure had checks for those (it already checks > > for > > __builtin_choose_expr and __builtin_expect). > > I've attached patches to do that, but I'm not sure if this is the > right way to do it (see bug #131688). > > The first patch extends Configure. > > The second patch extends config_h.SH, which contains a comment saying > "THIS IS A GENERATED FILE. DO NOT HAND-EDIT. See > Porting/config_h.pl", but I saw Porting/config_h.pl and it contains no > useful information, so I hand-edited anyway. Now that metaconfig has its repository on github.com, should this RT be re-formulated as an issue at that location? https://github.com/perl5-metaconfig/metaconfig/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue Thank you very much. -- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org) --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: new https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131689Thread Next