Re: It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized

Karl Williamson wrote:
> On 09/15/2017 07:01 AM, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
> > Karl Williamson wrote:
> >> In case someone is so moved.
> >
> > Exceptions would have to be made for macros like DEBUG_S_warn in op.c.
> >
> 
> I don't see any operations where those arguments could have precedence
> issues in the definition of that macro.

Precisely.  That macro must *not* have parentheses around 'args', but
a naive porting test would flag it.  That is why a porting test would
need an exceptions list.

• It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized by Karl Williamson
• Re: It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized by Karl Williamson
• Re: It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized by Karl Williamson
• Re: It would be nice to have a porting test that checks that macroarguments involved in expressions are parenthesized by Father Chrysostomos