Zefram wrote: > I've only established a correspondence for one bit. Per documentation, > all the remaining bits of gflags are reserved for future use; there's no > commitment to them having any particular relationship to bits of ckflags. In that case, the existing flag (REQUIRE_GV) does *not* set a pattern for future flags to follow. As I have pointed out, it does not pro- vide anything useful. I think all it provides is confusion, so it should best be left out. I am not strongly attached to this opin- ion, though. I hope this thread will have more than two participants before it ends.Thread Previous | Thread Next