Father Chrysostomos wrote: >> From: jkeenan@pobox.comxsawyerx@gmail.com (James E Keenan Sawyer X) > >Strange. The actual header line as transmitted was: From: James E Keenan <jkeenan@pobox.com>Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> which is syntactically invalid. People's MUAs are interpreting this in quite a variety of ways. Mutt (which I use) renders it as the relatively sober From: James E Keenan <jkeenan@pobox.com>, Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> (Multiple authors of one message is a valid usage, though rare.) mauke on IRC mentioned James E KeenanSawyer X <"jkeenan@pobox.comxsawyerx"@gmail.com> which is at least syntactically valid, unlike the concatenation that you quoted above. There's a lesson somewhere in here about the application of the Postel principle. -zeframThread Previous | Thread Next