develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2017

Re: [perl #23813] [PATCH] misleading example in perldoc -f flock

Thread Previous
Dave Mitchell
March 29, 2017 11:14
Re: [perl #23813] [PATCH] misleading example in perldoc -f flock
Message ID:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 02:58:55PM -0800, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:13:20 GMT, wrote:
> > I agree with Nick's complaint and with the other observations in this
> > thread. The seek may not be necessary, but this comment at least
> > explains why, whereas removing the seek doesn't teach anyone anything.
> > 
> > Patch attached.
> List:  Is the documentation change to perlfunc proposed by Dan Collins
> acceptable?

Yes, but lets apply it after 5.26....

> If so, is this 13-year-old ticket closable?

...and then close the ticket.

Indomitable in retreat, invincible in advance, insufferable in victory
    -- Churchill on Montgomery

Thread Previous Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About