Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote: >One that I can think of is unary plus. Ah, indeed, that could appear in a legitimate program. It's not a usage to preserve, there being no need for such disambiguation in this context. (If we did want to preserve it, for consistency a similar unary plus ought to be permitted on parameters declared in subroutine signatures.) A related usage is nested parens. These are legal, don't break anything, and could arise by accident from refactoring. But, like unary plus, they also don't achieve anything in the "my" context, and it's not worth the complexity of preserving their permissibility. -zeframThread Previous | Thread Next