Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2017
On 27 March 2017 at 16:10, Dan Collins <dcollinsn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had a chance to make sure that this test environment isn't horribly
> broken...
Yeah, there's enough broken you sort of need a double-testing system.
Start with =0 , and then upon hitting a failure, retry with =1 ...
while paying care
not to let the =1 bleed into children in the recursive step.
eg:
1. Install X with UNSAFE_INC=0
2. Configure fails?
1. Report N/A Fail
2. Generate META.JSON with UNSAFE_INC=1
3. Installdeps with UNSAFE_INC=0
4. Run tests with UNSAFE_INC=0
5. Tests Fail?
1. Report FAIL
2. Re-run tests with UNSAFE_INC=1
3. Report Test result
I don't know how to make my tools do this automatically so I've been
doing it manually and filing bugs, to fill the gaps in automation.
--
Kent
KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next