develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2017

[perl #128769] Bleadperl v5.25.3-22-g8901dde breaksFLORA/Class-C3-XS-0.13.tar.gz

Thread Next
From:
James E Keenan via RT
Date:
March 20, 2017 15:37
Subject:
[perl #128769] Bleadperl v5.25.3-22-g8901dde breaksFLORA/Class-C3-XS-0.13.tar.gz
Message ID:
rt-4.0.24-14986-1490024253-798.128769-15-0@perl.org
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:53:42 GMT, davem wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:07:55PM +0100, Sawyer X wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/26/2016 03:11 AM, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
> > > On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:30:13 GMT, jkeenan wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 09 Aug 2016 20:37:52 GMT, shay wrote:
> > >>> On 7 August 2016 at 11:03, Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 08/07/2016 07:07 AM, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
> > >>>>> How should we resolve this ticket now (in addition to patching
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> CPAN modules)?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Do my changes to base.pm need to be +1’ed by two other people
> > >>>>> so
> > >>>>> that we can backport them to the maint branches and release new
> > >>>>> RCs?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The patches in question are:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> bca552795994a553e07b38a6f82a233533919926
> > >>>>> ec7784b4e79ac75599f2c7705b9389e05d47d1d1
> > >>>>> 362f3f748cb84934a072fadbfb8b51090e2f9afe
> > >>>>> 458470f62360040dcd4b5a55c8ba07503e1af5fc
> > >>>>> 5e196316f76f6f3ce68647b65f6a2609b286674b
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>> +1.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'll go ahead and make new RCs with backports of these five
> > >>> patches
> > >>> unless I hear of any more changes being required in the next day
> > >>> or
> > >>> two. Thanks for your work on this.
> > >> Has the work which P5P had to do for this RT been completed?
> > >>
> > >> If so, do we have a plan for the BBC issues?
> > >>
> > >> Thank you very much.
> > > Repeating the question:
> > >
> > > Has the work which P5P had to do for this RT been completed?
> > >
> > > If so, do we have a plan for the BBC issues?
> >
> > (Apparently adding "shift" just removes the email I was about to
> > send. Yay.)
> >
> > These were all merged but I think we should remove them in favor of
> > the
> > upcoming revised patch (based on Chris' comments) by Aristotle, work
> > in
> > progress is on ap/baseincguard.
> 
> Are we still planning to do this for 5.26.0? If not, can this ticket
> be removed from the blockers list?

My vote would be to remove it from the blockers list.  Even if the work in the ap/baseincguard were to be completed, there's not sufficient time to test it against CPAN before full code freeze.

But this is a pumpking's call.

Thank you very much.
-- 
James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org)

---
via perlbug:  queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128769

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About