On 02/23/2017 04:47 PM, Zefram wrote: > Karl Williamson wrote: >> If it really is the case that we can't change it, this sounds important >> enough to make new behavior turned on via a feature, > That would just be confusing. Better to leave do() alone and simply > add a subroutine (exported from some module in the ordinary manner) > that exhibits the preferred behaviour. > > it could be called do_do (pronounced doodoo! :). uri <ducking>Thread Previous | Thread Next