On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Kenichi Ishigaki <kishigaki@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is it possible/reasonable to remove the . (or any insecure relative > directory in @INC) only when it's confirmed unreasonably insecure (not > by a name but by testing actual permission), in order not to affect > people running their scripts under a directory with proper permissions > like their home? Any writable directory is theoretically insecure if a relative path is in @INC. Also, this does not really apply specifically to the topic of do(). -DanThread Previous | Thread Next