On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Father Chrysostomos <sprout@cpan.org> wrote: > > > I do not. The main reasons for using the function are to work around > problems with buggy XS modules. Adding a synonym for a function that > most correct code should not be using seems like the wrong direction > to be going in. > But with a synonym available, the documentation can be changed to cover the synonym, and only mention in passing that "this function is also called is_utf8", which would at least help with the primary issue that people are using this function to test for UTF-8.Thread Previous | Thread Next