Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2017
On 13 February 2017 at 10:21, Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote: > Kent, you are rash in your analysis. > > You do not know about every conversation that takes place outside your > immediate view, but you continuously assume that unless you were a > witness to something, it did not happen and unless you accept something, > it is not good. Then don't blame toolchain for making this decision dude. If it was discussed in private behind closed doors, then it wasn't "Discussed extensively with toolchain", unless there's a second toolchain called "#toolchain-withoutkentnl". Maybe you did discuss it extensively with some members who might be considered toolchain. But your assertion is it "has been discussed extensively with toolchain". And that, based on the above arguments, suggests that you're making a misleading statement. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNLThread Previous | Thread Next