Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2017
On 13 February 2017 at 00:34, Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote: > Considering this has been discussed exhaustively with toolchain It really hasn't by any stretch of imagination been discussed "exhaustively", a few days discussion where this approach was "the least repugnant", and alternative approaches that were less volatile were dismissed. This seems more apropos of "Hastily", not "Exhaustively". And I'd imagine "Haste" is in application here because you want to reach a conclusion before we hit feature freeze. "Heatedly" discussed may also be correct. But suggesting that this subject has been given a thorough dissection and that we've reached the best conclusion after much thought is still a very premature statement IMO. Say what you want, do what you want, just don't try deceiving yourself that this is "Good and well studied discussion", that's pure politics. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNLThread Previous | Thread Next