Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment?

On 01/30/2017 05:32 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 09:00 AM, Sawyer X wrote:
>> I appreciate starting the discussion on this and reaching further to the
>> community to illicit more comments.
>
> The correct term is 'elicit'

I'm battling my defense. Dyslexia, second-language problems, fuzzy words
in English, or mere incompetence. Hmm... :)

Thank you for the correction!

• Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by David Nicol
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Dave Mitchell
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Dave Mitchell
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Sawyer X
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Eric Wong
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Sawyer X
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Eric Wong
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by David Cantrell
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Andy Lester
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Andy Lester
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Sawyer X
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Karl Williamson
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Sawyer X
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Tim Bunce
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by perl
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by perl
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Steffen Mueller
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Tom Christiansen
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Steffen Mueller
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by perl
• Status of NO_TAINT_SUPPORT define (Was: Re: Should we considerlocked hashes a failed experiment?) by Steffen Mueller
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Steffen Mueller
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by James E Keenan
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by James E Keenan
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq
• Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment? by demerphq