develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2017

[perl #130641] Bleadperl v5.25.8-36-g6cdc5cd8f3 breaksHURRICUP/DTL-Fast-1.622.tar.gz

Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson via RT
Date:
January 31, 2017 02:56
Subject:
[perl #130641] Bleadperl v5.25.8-36-g6cdc5cd8f3 breaksHURRICUP/DTL-Fast-1.622.tar.gz
Message ID:
rt-4.0.24-22968-1485831374-1620.130641-15-0@perl.org
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:30:29 -0800, andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR@franz.ak.mind.de wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:31:43 -0800, "karl williamson via RT"
> >>>>> <perlbug-followup@perl.org> said:
> 
> > Ok, then, we should reject this ticket, and write ones on the
> > distros.
> > Who does that?
> 
> My favorite workflow would be there is no reject for BBCs unless the
> BBC
> itself is faulty, say, the reporter had dirt in his eyes.
> 
> If it is a valid BBC, either perl is broken or modules on CPAN. The
> next
> release of perl needs to deal with it some way. The ticket should
> remain
> open until we have developed confidence that enough repair has been
> applied and enough time has passed. The time factor is necessary
> because
> we expect some "also affected" messages to arrive a bit later than the
> original ticket.
> 
> After a BBC, we must face it, there is a need to improve either perl
> or
> CPAN. If it is CPAN, module authors need help, and there's no way to
> declare that as somebody else's problem.
> 
> Alternate views welcome.

Are confirmation views welcome? :)

I agree with your workflow.
-- 
Karl Williamson

---
via perlbug:  queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130641

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About