develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2017

Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
demerphq
Date:
January 29, 2017 07:21
Subject:
Re: Should we consider locked hashes a failed experiment?
Message ID:
CANgJU+UzS_5xv5eYQLCqTpCFx3_pD3XRqDhoYX-aUQdrAJqbxA@mail.gmail.com
On 28 January 2017 at 16:52, James E Keenan <jkeen@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 01/28/2017 09:31 AM, demerphq wrote:
>>
>>
>> What do people think? Should every hash access and store pay a penalty
>> for locked hashes when they are almost unused?
>>
>
> I recommend also posting this idea in a more public-facing location such as
> blogs.perl.org.

Done:

http://blogs.perl.org/users/demerphq/2017/01/are-restrictedlocked-hashes-a-failed-experiment.html

Yves

-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About