Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Karl Williamson
<public@khwilliamson.com> wrote:
>
> If we have a sequence that must all match, it seems to me we should be using
> memcmp() regardless of alignment.

or at least crib its comparison method versus length heuristic (if any.)


-- 
"Have you taken yourself seriously today?" -- the gravity clown

• some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by Dave Mitchell
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by hv
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by demerphq
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by Zefram
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by Karl Williamson
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by demerphq
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by David Nicol
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by Karl Williamson
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by David Nicol
• Re: some thoughts on 8-bytes-at-a-time in the regex engine by Karl Williamson