On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:50:23 GMT, jkeenan wrote: > On Tue May 08 12:02:40 2012, hv wrote: > > Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > > :> Perhaps there's a less ridiculous option that causes a build > > failure. > > : > > :Likely. But your example suggests to me that *mini*perl should ignore > > all of > > :these, as they aren't* used by the build process, and that the > > invocations for > > :./perl should explicitly clear them all. > > : > > :(Which isn't too hard actually, as ./perl is, or should be, invoked > > :consistently throughout the Makefile with a macro that sets up > > :"LD_LIBRARY_PATH" etc) > > : > > :If this idea seems sane, an no-one else beats me to it, I'll try to > > do it in > > :the next couple of months. > > > > I think by "should ignore all of these" you're saying "ignore anything > > in > > PERL5OPT" (or possibly "PERL5OPT and friends"). > > > > If so, please consider whether it is worth providing a mechanism to > > specify > > the value to use for PERL5OPT (resp. "... and friends") for the > > miniperl > > build as a get-out clause. > > > > I do not have a use for this myself, so I do not request it; but I > > imagine, > > should it be of use, it would be easier to make that change now than > > to try > > and restore the facility in a user-controllable form later. > > > > Hugo > > > > > Nicholas, do you think we should proceed with this? > > Thank you very much. > Jim Keenan The discussion in this ticket petered out more than 3 years ago -- and we never had a clear statement of the problem to be solved in the first place. So I recommend closing this ticket (and will do so within 7 days unless someone objects). Thank you very much. -- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org) --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=5844Thread Previous