On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:51:42 GMT, demerphq wrote: > On 21 June 2016 at 16:44, Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 06/20/2016 08:14 PM, Lukas Mai wrote: > >> Am 17.06.2016 um 22:17 schrieb demerphq: > >>> On 17 June 2016 at 22:15, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> If you mean changing the signature of scalar(%hash). IMO yes, we > >>>> should, and if there is support for doing so the > >>> > >>> then yes I am interested in implementing this for 5.25.x. > >> > >> I'd like that. > > > > If we're voting, I'll throw a +1 on that too. :) > > I just pushed a branch that contains code to do this as: smoke- > me/no_xhv_fill > > The patch relevant to this thread is > > commit 28ecb9747cbb8efad36d9f022e2ef47ba54c6e14 > Author: Yves Orton <demerphq@gmail.com> > Date: Mon Jun 20 22:51:38 2016 +0200 > > Change scalar(%hash) to be the same as 0+keys(%hash) > > I am going to start a new thread to discuss this. > > Yves This ticket was originally filed back in 2012 and was a complaint about performance. Have we addressed the original poster's concerns? Is the ticket closeable? Thank you very much. -- James E Keenan (jkeenan@cpan.org) --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=114576Thread Next