develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2016

Re: Does the range operator still have the Unicode Bug?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
December 22, 2016 18:51
Subject:
Re: Does the range operator still have the Unicode Bug?
Message ID:
6ea39a31-fced-43f5-6b58-10ad6b18a400@khwilliamson.com
On 12/14/2016 04:05 PM, Aaron Crane wrote:
> Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> wrote:
>> * Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> [2016-12-14 19:24]:
>>> On 11/20/2016 11:03 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
>>>> On 11/20/2016 08:20 AM, Aaron Crane wrote:
>>>
>>> I think the patch should be committed.
>>
>> It would at least have to be completed before it can be committed,
>> all other disagreements aside.
>
> I've just rebased the patch in question against current blead, adding
> a perldelta entry for it, and pushed it to
> smoke-me/arc/unicode-range-operator.
>
> What else did you have in mind for it to be considered complete?
>
> I suspect I may have misled you by both attaching a full patch and
> inlining only a small part of it in my message. But if there's
> anything else you were expecting to see, please do let me know.
>

The documentation needs to be patched.  Besides the obvious ones, I 
found these: feature.pm, perlunicode, perluniintro (minor).

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About