> > If anything, I'd lean towards fixing Module::Load, if only because we > actually have other modules in core that already depend on it (mostly > via Module::Load::Conditional). > This is my opinion as well. Compared to Module::Load, Module::Runtime has a couple of extra workarounds for bugs in pre-5.12 perls that can be easily ported if deemed acceptable with regards to compatibility. Module::Rutime's interface is generally better, but the relevant alternate interfaces could be added to Module::Load. Let's just focus in having one good loader in core, that's less maintenance in the long run, and more user-friendly. VincentThread Previous | Thread Next