Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2016
On 12/04/2016 11:55 AM, Sawyer X wrote: > It has been suggested several times to ship Module::Runtime in core. I > have considered it and discussed it with Zefram a little bit yesterday. > I don't recall those discussions, perhaps because I look more closely at RT items than other mailing list entries. But I will take a look at it. If we decide to go forward, I recommend opening an RT to log the inclusion. > Here's my basic pitch: Module::Runtime provides users with basic > functions that correctly implement a common practice of loading modules > at runtime. That's it. > > Unlike other suggested modules[1], Module::Runtime provides a basic need > and is mostly unopinionated[2]. In that sense, it satisfies a common > need that is shared by many developers, regardless of their framework of > choice. > > Zefram was willing to provide additional comments for consideration for > inclusion or exclusion, and as far as I understand, has no feelings one > way or the other regarding it. > > What do you think? > > [1] Plack, Dancer2, Moose. > All of the above are too much for core.Thread Previous | Thread Next