develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2016

Re: Should we bring in Module::Runtime into core?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
James E Keenan
December 4, 2016 21:10
Re: Should we bring in Module::Runtime into core?
Message ID:
On 12/04/2016 11:55 AM, Sawyer X wrote:
> It has been suggested several times to ship Module::Runtime in core. I
> have considered it and discussed it with Zefram a little bit yesterday.

I don't recall those discussions, perhaps because I look more closely at 
RT items than other mailing list entries.  But I will take a look at it. 
  If we decide to go forward, I recommend opening an RT to log the 

> Here's my basic pitch: Module::Runtime provides users with basic
> functions that correctly implement a common practice of loading modules
> at runtime. That's it.
> Unlike other suggested modules[1], Module::Runtime provides a basic need
> and is mostly unopinionated[2]. In that sense, it satisfies a common
> need that is shared by many developers, regardless of their framework of
> choice.
> Zefram was willing to provide additional comments for consideration for
> inclusion or exclusion, and as far as I understand, has no feelings one
> way or the other regarding it.
> What do you think?
> [1] Plack, Dancer2, Moose.

All of the above are too much for core.

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About