Hugo van der Sanden via RT wrote: >You also get the benefit that *you already have this*: Except that foreach and while/each have completely different behaviour with respect to iterators and modification during iteration. There's value in adding the indexed form of foreach, even with the language already having array each. >I'm guessing (wildly) that when the "experimental each on scalar" >deprecation advances to removal, we could consider extending each() >to lists to support: Wouldn't be possible. There's nowhere for the iterator to live. -zeframThread Previous | Thread Next