On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 23:52:12 -0800, ntyni@debian.org wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:24:23PM -0800, Pip Cet via RT wrote: > > That patch fixes things for ldinf, but doesn't appear to do anything > > for ldnan. > > I only patched the obvious bugs. I don't see randomness (or even non- > zero > high bytes) in ldnan here so I didn't touch that part. > > But yes, ldnan should probably get the same treatment. Patch attached. Thanks, applied as dd6885360b15e763e0706dc28555eea328de432d and 6b2c7479d6d33249c2385d8a36d8ee9e61e1a519. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130133Thread Previous | Thread Next