On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:24:23PM -0800, Pip Cet via RT wrote: > That patch fixes things for ldinf, but doesn't appear to do anything for ldnan. I only patched the obvious bugs. I don't see randomness (or even non-zero high bytes) in ldnan here so I didn't touch that part. But yes, ldnan should probably get the same treatment. Patch attached. -- NikoThread Previous | Thread Next