On 14 November 2016 at 21:32, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I know the only thing that is > really "special" is that Tie-Hash-NamedCapture is not by statically > link the library, whereas since the "tie" logic for @+ and friends > lives in mg.c, you already have it loaded with the core libraries. That sentence got mangled when I fat-finger sent the mail too early. As far as I know the only thing that is really "special" about Tie-Hash-NamedCapture is that it is not normally statically compiled into perl, and that it uses the full blown perl tie api. So I don't see why it would present any different challenge than @+ or $1 do. cheers, YvesThread Previous