are lexical subs supposed to override keywords?

It surprised me that perl keywords are overridden by lexical sub names.
Is this intentional? I couldn't find anything in perlsub about it.

    my sub for { print "in lex sub (@_) \n" }
    for (1,2);
    
outputs

    in lex sub (1 2)



-- 
This email is confidential, and now that you have read it you are legally
obliged to shoot yourself. Or shoot a lawyer, if you prefer. If you have
received this email in error, place it in its original wrapping and return
for a full refund. By opening this email, you accept that Elvis lives.

• are lexical subs supposed to override keywords? by Dave Mitchell
• Re: are lexical subs supposed to override keywords? by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: are lexical subs supposed to override keywords? by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: are lexical subs supposed to override keywords? by demerphq