* Aristotle Pagaltzis <pagaltzis@gmx.de> [2016-10-27 10:28]: > 0 0 26 > 1 0 26 > 1 1 702 > 0 1 702 FWIW I am uncomfortable with fixing this right away, since there might be code which inadvertently relies on this. There is no question in my mind about *whether* this ought to be fixed, since if there is any code that depends on this bug, then with 100% certainty there is much more code which expects this *not* to happen, which is therefore currently broken (actively or passively). But I’d want to add a warning here first to see what creepy-crawlies we scare out of their hiding places, if any, and then take it from there.Thread Previous | Thread Next