> On Oct 26, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Dan Book <grinnz@gmail.com> wrote: > > My assumption would be that they aren't mentioned because opening it for only reading is useless because it doesn't exist, and for only writing is useless because you don't know what its filename is; you might as well just open the handle to /dev/null. > I’m thinking that adding that specifically would be worth noting, just for the sake of completeness, if the behavior isn’t a bug itself. -- Andy Lester => www.petdance.comThread Previous | Thread Next