Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2016
On 10/21/2016 02:16 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:48 PM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 21 Oct 2016 9:36 p.m., "Craig A. Berry" <craig.a.berry@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Dennis Kaarsemaker >>> <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 08:41 -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: > >>>>> Speaking of blame, will git blame return to gitweb when you upgrade, >>>>> or is that too prone to getting your server clobbered? > >>>> Yves was convinced it wasn't needed anymore, "as there are now better >>>> ways to do blame" (paraphrased. Forgot the exact wording). >>>> >>>> If you or someone else actually uses it, I'll bring it back after >>>> implementing throttling. >>> >>> I do use it, and I'm not aware of any way to do archive diving that is >>> more convenient and that I can get to from anywhere without needing a >>> local repository. I might just be ill-informed, though. So no big >>> rush, but I find it a very nice feature to have. I use it too. >> >> The github mirror has blame. Is there a reason you don't like it? > > It's a lot slower than gitweb and spends a lot of screen real estate > on things other than code (all the cute avatars and so forth). IIRC > it also truncates long lines of code with no way to see more. > > If the cost of providing blame via perl5.git.perl.org is high or > brings a lot of headaches with it, then maybe it's time to reconsider > offering it. But I'm not sure what's different now compared to all > the years we've been running it. > >> Is the mirror not up to date enough? > > That I don't know as I've never used it. Today it's inaccessible due > to the severe DNS problems in the eastern US :-(. [1] > > [1] <http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/10/dos-attack-on-major-dns-provider-brings-internet-to-morning-crawl/> >Thread Previous | Thread Next