Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2016
On 10/18/2016 01:04 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> [2016-10-17 23:00]: >> I understand it is important to you, Michael, and I respect that. >> I hope you understand it is important to us as well and that is why we >> decided on this course of action. It is our position that security in >> this case takes precedence. > To be clear, because my name is on the final patch: this “we” does not > include me, and I do not agree with my own patch. Until the decision to > ship *some* form of this change was made, I argued against it; once it > was, I turned to doing whatever was in my power to at least limit the > fallout. Let me clarify: I've thanked people who have *helped*, not necessarily agreed. I have clarified in my comments to Michael that the security team (which does not include Aristotle nor Peter, who have voiced their objections and disagreements) had made this decision. When I wrote "we", I had meant the security team. Helping does not require agreeing and thanking does not indicate agreeing. I hope this helps clear that up.Thread Previous | Thread Next