Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef

Tony Cook wrote:
> => only differs from the comma operator in that it quotes identifiers
> given as its left argument.

More precisely (or pedantically), it quotes an identifier immediately
preceding it.  In the case of "foo".bar=>"baz", bar is not the argu-
ment to the fat arrow (rather, "foo".bar is), yet bar still gets
quoted.  This is what allows -tk=> to work.

• Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Sam Kington
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by David Nicol
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Tony Cook
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by David Nicol
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Lukas Mai
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Aristotle Pagaltzis
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by David Cantrell
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Sam Kington
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Zefram
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Sam Kington
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Kent Fredric
• Re: Extend the fat comma to deal with undef by Sam Kington