On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:00:06AM +0100, James Raspass wrote: > Measured with the following crude perl script calling perf. Perl > is in there to get a rough baseline cost of starting perl: > > print 'PERL', (`perf stat -r100 perl -e 1 2>&1`)[10]; > print 'OLD ', (`perf stat -r100 perl lib/overload.pm 2>&1`)[10]; > print 'NEW ', (`perf stat -r100 perl lib/overload2.pm 2>&1`)[10]; > > Produced the following results on my machine: > > PERL 5,800,051 instructions # 1.05 insns per cycle ( +- 0.06% ) > OLD 14,818,995 instructions # 1.16 insns per cycle ( +- 0.03% ) > NEW 14,696,974 instructions # 1.16 insns per cycle ( +- 0.03% ) > > While the numbers did fluctuate between runs, the new code was > consistently faster. Thanks, applied as v5.25.5-43-g607ee43. -- That he said that that that that is is is debatable, is debatable.Thread Next