Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2016
On Tue Sep 13 12:14:27 2016, demerphq wrote: > On 13 September 2016 at 21:06, Todd Rinaldo via RT > <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > > On Tue Sep 13 12:01:23 2016, demerphq wrote: > >> > >> We can and should audit for similar patterns, but my gut feeling is > >> that this code is pretty unusual, as it is trying to extract the > >> function part of a fully qualified name. > >> > > > > S_parse_gv_stash_name is making a similar look ahead mistake with > > name_cursor[1]. That looks messier to fix but it should probably be > > another case or a committer should just go through and make the > > corrections sans perlbug? > > A quick look didnt reveal to me any issues here. If you look at the > way it uses name_em1 and name_end it looks fine. Can you point me more > closely at the code you suspect? > Yep. Apologies. I pulled the trigger too quick on that one. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129267Thread Previous | Thread Next