Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2016
On Tue Sep 13 12:01:23 2016, demerphq wrote: > > We can and should audit for similar patterns, but my gut feeling is > that this code is pretty unusual, as it is trying to extract the > function part of a fully qualified name. > S_parse_gv_stash_name is making a similar look ahead mistake with name_cursor[1]. That looks messier to fix but it should probably be another case or a committer should just go through and make the corrections sans perlbug? --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129267Thread Previous | Thread Next