Father Chrysostomos wrote: > Maybe that is our way out: to make a distinction between 'when' >and '~~' overloading. No, that would be dreadful. The same issues about ~~ lhs overloading would apply to when overloading. The language would also be less comprehensible by virtue of having these two slightly different matching facilities. Given our problem of an overcomplex language feature, splitting it so that we have two overcomplex language features isn't a step forward. -zeframThread Previous | Thread Next