Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S"

Dave Mitchell wrote:
>..\toke.c(7586) : error C2105: '--' needs l-value
...
>7586: 	    UNIBRACK(-OP_ENTEREVAL);
>
>The error would seem to imply that OP_ENTEREVAL has been defined to a
>negative value,

That's not how the C preprocessor works.  Macro expansion can't paste
two adjacent "-" tokens into a "--".  In any case, the OP_ values have
never been negative.

>So I can't see what the problem is.

I too have no idea where this "--" could be coming from.

-zefram

• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by James E Keenan via RT
• Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Dan Collins
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Zefram
• Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by ilmari
• Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by ilmari
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Dan Collins via RT
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Father Chrysostomos via RT
• [perl #129196] Segmentation fault: "evalbytes S" by Dan Collins