Re: Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic

Such strange behavior of "~" operator (implicit signed integer context) 
seems to be also in slices and array indexes:

$ perl -le '@arr=1..5; print @arr[~1], $arr[~1]'
44

Kind regards,
Sergey Zhmylove.


31.08.2016 3:58, Father Chrysostomos wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
>> THis seems inconsistent at best, but I wasn't sure exactly what to 
>> report.
> It is inconsistent.  I think it is a bug.  But deciding how it should
> behave is the hard part.  Can we change it without breaking peo-
> ple's code?
> 
> I suppose the way to change it without breaking people's code is to
> make foreach match the dotty behaviour.

• Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic by Matt S Trout
• Re: Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic by korg
• Re: Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic by Josh Juran
• Re: Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic by Father Chrysostomos
• Re: Not sure if this is a bug or not: Ranges and integer arithmetic by Sergey Zhmylove