[perl #107726] Filter::Simple with immediately following "no"

On Thu Sep 12 19:18:12 2013, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
> * Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au> [2013-09-12T17:57:07]
> >
> > Yes, looks likely.  It actually only needs a flag rather than a count
> > anyway I suppose.
> 
> Could you write a test for the bug?  Then I'll apply your test and my
> patch and
> we'll high five. :)

I have just added a test in 7e9e80a7 and applied Ricardo’s patch as 8bc40f3a4eb.

-- 

Father Chrysostomos


---
via perlbug:  queue: perl5 status: stalled
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=107726

• [perl #107726] Filter::Simple with immediately following "no" by Father Chrysostomos via RT