Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2016
On Sun Jun 26 09:52:37 2016, demerphq wrote:
> On 25 June 2016 at 13:02, Andreas J. Koenig via RT
> <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig)
> > # Please include the string: [perl #128482]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> > # <URL: https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128482 >
> >
> >
> > bisect
> > ------
> > commit 8bf4c4010cc474d4000c2a8c78f6890fa5f1e577
> > Author: Yves Orton <demerphq@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon Jun 20 22:51:38 2016 +0200
> >
> > Change scalar(%hash) to be the same as 0+keys(%hash)
>
> This tests that scalar() passes through to the perl internal
> definition for scalar(%hash), which changed in 5.25
>
> like($pre_v5_8_3 ? tied(%hash)->scalar : scalar(%hash), qr{\d+/\d+},
> 'Standard hash: buckets allocated in scalar context')
> or diag('scalar %hash: '
> . $pre_v5_8_3 ? tied(%hash)->scalar : scalar(%hash));
>
> It could be changed to only test the booleanness of the scalar(%hash),
> or it could be taught that in 5.25 and later the return of
> scalar(%hash) is supposed to be the count of keys. I note that in
> other contexts it returns 0/1 so...
>
> Yves
>
Another victim:
https://github.com/garu/Data-Printer/issues/98
---
via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128482